• RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Comments



FACTS: This is a matter for admission to the bar and oath taking of a successful bar applicant. Petitioner Al Caparros Argosino was previously involved with hazing which caused the death of Raul Camaligan a neophyte during fraternity initiation rites but he was convicted for Reckless Imprudence Resulting in Homicide. He was sentenced with 2 years and 4 months of imprisonment where he applied a probation thereafter which was approved and granted by the court. He took the bar exam and passed but was not allowed to take the oath. He filed for a petition to allow him to take the lawyer’s oath of office and to admit him to the practice of law averring that his probation was already terminated. The court note that he spent only 10 months of the probation period before it was terminated.


ISSUE: Whether or not Al Argosino may take the lawyer’s oath office and admit him to the practice of law.


HELD: The practice of law is a privilege granted only to those who possess the STRICT, INTELLECTUAL and MORAL QUALIFICATIONS required of lawyers who are instruments in the effective and efficient administration of justice. The court upheld the principle of maintaining the good moral character of all Bar members, keeping in mind that such is of greater importance so far as the general public and the proper administration of justice are concerned. Hence he was asked by the court to produce evidence that would certify that he has reformed and has become a responsible member of the community through sworn statements of individuals who have a good reputation for truth and who have actually known Mr. Argosino for a significant period of time to certify that he is morally fit to the admission of the law profession. The petitioner is then allowed to take the lawyer’s oath, sign the Roll of Attorney’s and thereafter to practice the legal profession.

Categories:

Leave a Reply